Do remineralizing filters really work?

Do remineralizing filters really work?

The short answer is no.

Many companies suggest that because reverse osmosis systems remove the minerals from water that you should add a remineralizing filter afterwards for the purpose of restoring minerals to your water.

I’ve tested these filters and while the pH rose dramatically due to carbonates in the filter there were no minerals added.  A number of companies use coral calcium as the remineralizing filter and it is true that coral calcium contains some 70 trace minerals.  The problem is that the water passing through a filter system is not in contact with the coral calcium long enough to dissolve it.   The water picks up carbonate and as a result the pH increases but essentially no minerals are added.

So, what should you do about the lack of minerals in your reverse osmosis water?

Don’t worry about it.

I’ve now done substantial testing of water and minerals and concluded that while it would be nice to have minerals in your water, it’s far more important to remove the contaminants.  You can read a referenced article on that topic here: Minerals in Water.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

About James McMahon

Studied ecology at the University of Illinois, mountain survival at Eastern Washing University, Deep Ecology at Naropa, River Ecology with The Nature Conservancy and Luna Leopold
This entry was posted in Best Water Filter, Exposure to Toxins, Healthy Drinking Water, Reverse Osmosis, Sweetwater LLC, Water Purification. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Do remineralizing filters really work?

  1. Mark says:

    You need to remineralize the water because drinking acidic water is unhealthy. It will at the very least, demineralize your teeth, possibly causing you to break one on a hard peanut, or something.

    • Hi Mark,

      I appreciate your comments but that wasn’t the point of my post. The remineralizing filters that I have tested do not add minerals back into the water. That was my point. They are hype, as far as I can tell. If there is one that is working I would love to hear about it.

      They do raise the pH – too much in my opinion. And that is really what you’re addressing here when you talk about ro water being acidic. RO water is acidic and I think it is healthy to raise the pH slightly, to a pH of 7.4 or thereabout, to make it slightly alkaline. I do that in the RO systems I sell by using a calcite filter. Many remineralizing filters raise the pH to 9 or higher and that is unnatural and in my opinion unhealthy…maybe even dangerous.

      As for demineralizing your teeth, and possibly your bones, that is an area I am researching further. I don’t think that water has much to do with it but am open to learning differently. I do think that aging and diet are key factors. Again, thanks for commenting.

      • Kate says:

        Are you still searching for the answer?

        Heavy metals and aluminum in particular are to blame. When Fluoride is combined with aluminum from food (processed food for example), it removes Iodine from our cells and possibly other minerals.
        I’ve had enlarged thyroid my whole life. I switched to RO water (the only water that filters our fluoride completely) and stopped using fluoride toothpaste. And my thyroid got back to its normal size.

        I do have high aluminum in my body. Hence, cannot drink water with fluoride. Fluoride gets attached to aluminum and removes iodine from our organs and cells messing up enzyme production.

        Unbelievable, someone in 1940s did a research on mice, found out that adding fluoride to water is somewhat beneficial and since then, we’ve been drinking poisonous water.

        Cancer, autism, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, MS, and many other health problems have been on the rise since 1940.

        This is an answer to your search and your question.

        To detox from aluminum, you can drink high silica water, such as Fiji water.

  2. Bruce says:

    I am not a chemist, and my understanding of the science is insufficient to enable me to draw my own conclusions based on the science, but I am ok at critical thinking and I like what I read on your blog.

    I am in the process of designing my own home water treatment (RO) and I would like to talk to you; specifically about re-mineralization.

  3. Joseph Moreno says:

    What if you have an expensive esspresso machine? Manufacturers don’t want you to use Reverse osmosis because the machine depends upon the minerals to function properly but they also don’t want you to use tap water because the water is very hard and would require more frequent descaling which would be a hassle especially if you buy a machine that requires you to send the machine to a company to descale it.

    So what would be the best filter to use?

    • It is my understanding of coffee making that the presence of minerals contributes to better taste and lower acidity, but I do not know this for a fact.

      The filter you would use would depend on where you live and the mineral content of the water supply.

  4. Sam says:

    RO water filtration is probably the best. It filters down to 0.0001 micron. Adding a block style activated carbon filter also helps.
    To add minerals back into your water and help to raise the pH, you can add 1/4 teaspoon of Himalayan salt/gal.

  5. Justin Clark says:

    How can the short answer be no when you stated “I’ve tested these filters and while the pH rose dramatically due to carbonates in the filter there were no minerals added”. So does the remineralization propcess not perform pH increase?

  6. ryant says:

    i have well water that is pretty clean now, what would be the benifit from adding a RO system?

    • I would recommend a water test for your well water before purchasing anything. In terms of your question, I don’t know what ‘pretty clean’ means. If it means there are no contaminants, then there would be no benefit to adding an RO.

  7. Herbert de Graaf says:

    We just read up on WHO and other sources, as we use RO since a few years. Our concern about RO water beings to be that not only it does no longer contain good minerals, but especially that RO water that is used for cooking extracts these minerals from the food you cook and, when drunk, extracts minerals from the body which are then disposed through urination. This is why WHO says RO water presents a long term health hazard. What would you say to this?

    • First, the study you refer to is not a WHO study. It is a study funded by WHO in Eastern Europe. The study was published by the National Institue of Public Health in the Czech Republic. I have read that study and every reference in back. Some of these references simply refer to one another.

      Second, the study says nothing at all about RO water leaching minerals from your body or from your food when you cook. I don’t know where you read that nonsense, but that’s what it is. Minerals are not leached from the body by water. Now, if you are out running or working out on a hot day you may wish to drink electrolytes but that is another topic entirely.

      What the study does suggest is a link between drinking low TDS (total dissolved solids aka the minerals in water) water and heart disease. However the study totally ignores other factors including lifestyle considerations, air pollution, happiness, etc. Have you been to Eastern Europe? There are many factors which may affect the rate of heart disease other than drinking water. None of these were considered.

      So I did my own study on cities in the U.S. which have low tds water and the rate of heart disease. You can read that here. Those cities include Seattle, San Francisco, Portland, and Denver. NONE OF THEM have high rates of heart disease. ALL OF THEM have low tds water….from rain and snow in the mountains.

      There is a 1980 WHO study that makes bizaare assertions about minerals being leached from the body. That report went on to recommend the ideal composition of minerals in water. Do you realize that no one anywhere has water with an ideal composition of water.

      We drink the water that is available to use where we live. I don’t worry at all about low mineral content. I think WHO is full of you know what. However, mineral content can be too high, as it is in LA and any city drinking Colorado River water, as well as other similar sources. When mineral content is too high the water will not be hydrating….it will not effectively hydrate your cells. (Read the Wikipedia definition of Osmosis.

      Likewise, when there are pharmaceuticals in your water from cities upstream dumping sewage in your water, or when nitrates are present, or radioactive metals then you need to be drinking reverse osmosis water or you will suffer the negative health effects of these contaminants.

      Too much has been made of these WHO studies. The vibrant health of people in U.S. cities with naturally low tds water directly contradicts their findings. When WHO funds a study in the U.S. on tds I’ll read that. In the meantime I suggest you stop reading nonsense published on the internet. You may find information on my drinking water filters here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *